Wedded Bliss
I think it would be hard to write about
the rights of Americans without quoting the most important declaration of our nation
that “ We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”This is the
fundamental core of our doctrine, and it is our responsibility to make sure
that each citizen is a fulfillment of this universal truth.
Gay marriage is a big topic today
because there are states that are trying to legalize this institution so that
anyone has the right to marry whom they choose. I believe that without giving
everyone the right to choose who they legally bind themselves too, is in fact
violating this fundamental value of our nation. Sexual orientation should not
be considered a factor when we are to be a nation where religious beliefs are
separate from our democratic government. I read on Steve A.’s essay that the
idea of Separation of Church and state, may be going too far is it is removing
the ideals that our forefathers established based on their Christian beliefs.
It is true that our laws and government are based off of things that Christians
consider Godly. Laws based off of the Ten Commandments are also are universal
truths to most religions. And I do personally
think that it is important to recognize the foundation that we stand on. However, I feel that as a nation we need to
remind ourselves that we are to govern the people, who are all equal, without
religious prejudice. It is the belief of many Christians, and other faiths,
that a man should not marry a man, and woman should not marry a woman, and that
the sanctity of marriage is to be a union between a man and a woman only. I do believe though, when it comes to a civil union for the basis
of legal benefits and rights between one person and another, (because anyone can bind themselves to another
symbolically without legal recognition), we cannot hold religious doctrine to
the citizens of a nation that everyone is be equal under our laws. This would
be a block to an American citizen’s right to liberty and their personal pursuit
of happiness.
We must recognize this injustice
and think of the current and future consequences this restriction has/will have.
Families that could be stable homes will never be formed, people will be forced
to stay single, and never reach that next level of maturity in a relationship.
Children that need to be adopted may never be adopted into a loving
environment, and furthermore, children of single parents, may never experience
the benefit of two loving adults in their life. There are many consequences
that the future can hold and this will affect all of us as a nation. For example, we will provide more health care to the single person who can’t afford insurance,
and cannot get on their partners insurance.
We will not be able to supplicate the economy with more money spent on
more weddings, as well as the tax brackets that people will stay in as a single
adult. Unless we stand up for them, then we are making them second class
citizens that are not able to have the advantage of being an American, simply
because of their sexual orientation. Additionally, I think that it is hypocritical
of people to say that gay marriage will somehow tarnish the sanctity of
marriage when, if most of the marriages in this country as of now are
heterosexual, and many still end, in fact, half of them fail for reason that is
condemned just as much in the same religious doctrine that people try to use
against the idea of gay marriage, i.e. adultery.
I believe that we are doing the
exact opposite and creating a bigger problem for our nation by not allowing all
people to get married. It is oppressing people from the right to start a stable
home and pursue family life. This very oppression is what I believe aid in the
stagnant lifestyle that many gay people lead. Yes there is personal choice on how ones
lives, but hear me out. Even as a
Christian myself, (who does not believe that homosexuality is anymore an
“abomination” than eating shrimp according to Leviticus- the main book many
people like to use for this agenda) I believe that everyone should have the
right to a mature relationship and not only have the right to symbolically commit
themselves to another, but also have the legal benefits that this country gives
to those who promise their lives to each other.
I have read the letter that Paul wrote to the Corinthians where he describes
how wonderful it can be to be a single person, but that it takes a lot of self-discipline
to stay away from temptations and specifically sexually immoral relationships,
debauchery and such that come outside of the safe harbor of marriage. He
describes how marriage gives people a safe place, a companionship, to carry out
a Godly relationship that is sexually moral. It makes me think back to the days
in my life where I was young and single, fuelled by a culture of “freedom” and
alcohol, where my behavior was less than moral. If I was not afforded to opportunity
to marry someone and settle down with them, ,in a committed, and not only
moral, but legal union, would I not be in the same stagnant lifestyle if I was
told I had no right to marry the person that I chose to live with in such a
way? It is called settling down for a
reason, because many of us can say that we changed our ways when we married.
I personally know a married couple,
two women. They are wonderful, they are kind, they are happy, and they have two
children, who are being brought up in a loving home, with the support of two
parents, who can provide for each other and support each other, in all the ways
that a legal marriage provides. They are setting an example, in fact proof,
that this is what marriage is about, not their sexual orientation. They live
their lives happily, are not a burden to the government, and maintain a healthy
monogamous relationship. It was not easy though, they had to marry in another
state, and they reside in a state that does not support gay marriage. But, one
of them is lucky to work for a company that recognized their union so that they
can receive all the benefits from the employed. Think about all of the things
that a legal marriage provides: medical coverage or medical emergencies come to
my mind, or the right to not speak against their partner in a court of law. Think
of the rights that a loving step-parent has to be able to protect a child that
they love, or a husband being able to make medical decisions for his wife as
she lay dying. These rights are rights that people should have with the people that they
love, no matter what.
Whenever I speak about this
subject, I often find that I myself can only come up with one argument as to
why this deficiency in citizen’s rights is allowed. And that is the fact that
we are a democracy, with the right to vote. So therefore, if the majority of citizens
believe gay marriage should not be allowed, then it it will not be. Therein lays
the question though, that if this is the right of straight people, then it
should be the right of gay people, and therefore, should it be put to a vote at
all?
Sara Corso
No comments:
Post a Comment